Why everybody in the newsroom should do all their work on their phones
“Everybody in the newsroom should work exclusively on their phones all the time.” – Me. This morning. Sort of.
I was on a panel this morning at the BBC/New York Times Social Media Summit, and in the course of it I said a much retweeted thing, that I’d make everybody in newsrooms work on their phones all the time.
Obviously, I didn’t say that. But that’s how it boiled down when truncated to 140 characters.
Here’s what happened. Aron Pilhofer asked Laura Oliver what one change she’d make to the Guardian newsroom and processes, and then he asked me what one change I’d make to the New York Times offices. Which was ace, because I’ve never even visited them, and now I’m doing their change management for them ;-)
Laura said her thing, and then I said “The most radical change I’d make to newsrooms is to make everybody work on their phones”
And it would be radical. And preposterous. And unworkable.
But this is the reasoning behind it.
Most media companies produce their content on big glossy monitors and at the desktop scale. Most of the time their users are now consuming that content on mobile and tablet. There is a massive disconnect there, and it’s one of the things that I think holds legacy media companies back. It’s akin to making your programmes in colour in 1971, but not checking how the greyscale contrast works for the vast majority of the audience who still had black and white sets.
I went on to point out that music producers like Stock-Aitken-Waterman and various other pop luminaries always in the studio listened to how their track was going to sound on AM radio, not how it was going to sound in the luxurious environment of studio playback.
I bet most media companies have put out content thinking it’s fine that it doesn’t work quite OK on mobile. I’d always rather put out something that worked on mobile that was a bit sqwonky on desktop. You should be treating desktop as the second-class citizen now.
So, do I think everybody should do all their work on their phones?
Of course not.
But, and this was my point, imagine the culture shift in design, writing and story-telling you could force by banning the desktop computer from the newsroom. And making everybody think about the dominant consumption medium all the time.
It’s important for the non-designers/devs to be constantly aware that their work will look and be presented differently on mobile than on desktop…but that’s a significantly different situation than to *produce* on mobile.
To tie the creation/production process to the display device would bring all sorts of horrible inefficiencies….journalists already have it bad enough with the desktop CMS, now they have to deal with yet another layer between content and presentation?
Virtually all CMS-editors, including rich-text editors, do not reflect what the content will look like on even just a standard website, because it’s non-trivial to include production-CSS in what should be a place to focus on *writing* content (hence, the popularity of full-screen and zen-modes in many writing apps).
I agree that non-techies need to be aware that their content will look different than when they created it, but that level of realization should/could be enforced at the desktop level already. For other views, that’s what the Preview button is for.
Rubbish idea which just leads to rubbish like the beta version of the Guardian website. I ‘consume’ the Guardian on everything from an 8″ tablet to a 30″ monitor using the full fat version. I HATE the dumbed down ‘smartphone/tablet’ version.